| |
|
by Terence Blackburn
2000. 166 pp., 5 maps, 27 col. pl, 4 b & w plates and 45 illustrations,
bibliography, index. 21.5 x 15.2 cm., Softbound.
ISBN-10: 974-8304-66-3 $23.00
ISBN-13: 978-974-8304-66-3
|

Book review by Michael Smithies. (The
Nation, Bangkok, April 1, 2001)
The gradual occupation of Burmese territory in three wars waged by the British
in the 19th century is a well-known historical phenomenon, and Terence Blackburn
neatly summarises this in the present volume. Like China, but unlike Siam,
Burma was so isolated from the outer world that its kings, with the exception
of Mindon, were unable to realise that they were not the omphalos of the
world, and all-powerful throughout it. Blackburn, in his introduction, gives
a summary of Burma's history before the appearance of the British, and then
details their early relations with the Burmese court. Conflict became inevitable
when the borders of British India came up against the Burmese spheres of
influence in Arakan, Bengal and Manipur. More might have been made of the
alien concept of frontiers to people in the East; the West, fixated by maps
and precision, was unable to grasp the more fluid notion of traditional
spheres of influence and was certainly not friendly towards the territorial
expansionism of Burmese rulers.The First Anglo-Burmese War of 1824-26, "the
worst-managed war in British history" according to Hall, cost the lives
of some 15,000 British and Indian troops, and soon ended in the Treaty of
Yandabo, by which the Burmese were required to accept a British resident
at the court (then in Ava), and the loss of the provinces of Arakan, Tenasserim
and Assam. Burma was also required to pay one million pounds in indemnity
(which hardly offset the estimated cost to the British of the war, put at
15 million pounds).One wonders, too, if much was learned from the war on
the British side. The officers led from the front, and were the first to
be mown down; Blackburn rightly comments that the bright-red uniformed soldiers,
marching with noisy bands, were hardly inconspicuous, and to attack teakwood
stockade with rifles was a rather pointless pastime.The Second Anglo-Burmese
War, 1852, was soon in coming. Again the Burmese found it difficult to grasp
the concept of fixed frontiers, and Palmerston's adoption of the "civis
Britannicus sum" policy [see editor's note below] was bound to lead
to further conflict. Blackburn maintains that the war was provoked by the
British and Armenian merchant community in Rangoon, which objected to paying
Burmese taxes. The war lasted barely nine months, and Pegu and Rangoon were
acquired, making Burma a land-locked kingdom.
With the death of the relatively open-minded Mindon in
1878, and the ascent to the throne of the weak Thibaw and his scheming queen
Suphayarlat, things took a turn for the worse. Thibaw celebrated his coronation
with a bloodbath of horrendous proportions, eliminating all possible contestants
to the throne, some 80 in all. The protests of the British Resident, Shaw,
were ignored. Royal trading monopolies conflicted with agreements concerning
the free movement of trade. The appearance of the French in Mandalay sent
shivers down British spines in Burma, and the Third Anglo-Burmese War of
1885-86 became inevitable.
Mandalay was reached in November 1885. Thibaw surrendered his palace and
so his country, the palace was looted by local women, listed items were
set aside and the remaining treasures auctioned off to British officers.
Thibaw and two of his queens, including Suphayarlat, were sent off in bullock
carts (covered ones, if contemporary illustrations are accurate) to a steamer
and exile in India. The humiliation and occupation of Burma were complete.
Blackburn concentrates on the British military leaders
and civilian administrators during these momentous events, giving potted
biographies which do not always seem to appear at the right moment, towards
the end of the story. He makes much of the missing treasures of the royal
family; without thinking of how these were acquired (many pieces of the
regalia were held by the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, which does
not make the index, and returned to Burma in 1964). Inevitably in the confusion
many things disappeared, though whether they were taken by British or Burmese
citizens or soldiery will never be known for certain.
The illustrations, many in colour and taken from Burmese
chronicles, make the book particularly attractive, and though the tale has
been told before, it makes none the less interesting reading to see it again
in print. The title is clearly meant to be provocative: whether the British
set out to "humiliate" Burma is a moot point. Certainly their
actions had that effect, but conflict between an inward-looking court bent
on territorial expansion and a likewise expanding and well-armed Western
power was inevitable from the beginning.
Reading this story again makes one realise how lucky
Siam was in its dealings with the West at the same period; its considerably
more enlightened monarchs were able to make timely concessions and keep
the country intact and independent. Whereas Burma can always be seen as
an enclosed society, the same is far from true of Siam.
Editor's note
Henry Temple, 3rd Viscount of Palmerston (1784-1865),
was secretary of state for foreign affairs in the British Cabinet at the
time.
The term "civis Britannicus sum" ("l am a British citizen")
was imitated from the declaration "civis Romanus sum", whereby
a Roman citizen claimed legal privileges over the common rabble of the empire.
The right to Roman citizenship was progressively widened; hence the idea
of a common citizenship across boundaries within an empire.
[More Orchid Press
Reviews] |

|